Comments on: The problem with OGC support .. http://blog.webmapper.com.au/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/ Not another GIS blog Wed, 02 Jun 2010 04:13:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Geospatial » Blog Archive » Where art thou WCS clients? http://blog.webmapper.com.au/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/comment-page-1/#comment-21755 Geospatial » Blog Archive » Where art thou WCS clients? Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:31:21 +0000 http://chris.narx.net/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/#comment-21755 [...] guess this kinda gets back to my previous rants on this issue. We’ve got Deegree, Geoserver, Mapserver and quite a few other notable suppliers [...] [...] guess this kinda gets back to my previous rants on this issue. We’ve got Deegree, Geoserver, Mapserver and quite a few other notable suppliers [...]

]]> By: Where art thou WCS clients? at Chris’ GISmo’s http://blog.webmapper.com.au/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/comment-page-1/#comment-21266 Where art thou WCS clients? at Chris’ GISmo’s Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:13:50 +0000 http://chris.narx.net/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/#comment-21266 [...] guess this kinda gets back to my previous rants on this issue. We’ve got Deegree, Geoserver, Mapserver and quite a few other notable [...] [...] guess this kinda gets back to my previous rants on this issue. We’ve got Deegree, Geoserver, Mapserver and quite a few other notable [...]

]]> By: Taking it to “the man” at Chris’ GISmo’s http://blog.webmapper.com.au/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/comment-page-1/#comment-14913 Taking it to “the man” at Chris’ GISmo’s Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:06:55 +0000 http://chris.narx.net/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/#comment-14913 [...] Paul has graciously asked people to send him some queries to raise before the OGC technical meeting in Ottawa. In somewhat of an irony, it has been exactly 7 months to the day that my rant on client support was first posted. [...] [...] Paul has graciously asked people to send him some queries to raise before the OGC technical meeting in Ottawa. In somewhat of an irony, it has been exactly 7 months to the day that my rant on client support was first posted. [...]

]]> By: Matt Perry http://blog.webmapper.com.au/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/comment-page-1/#comment-1637 Matt Perry Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:58:59 +0000 http://chris.narx.net/2006/09/07/the-problem-with-ogc-support/#comment-1637 Chris, This is a great set of best practices for w*s clients. Three more for wms: - Ability to use your own styled layer descriptor (bonus points for implementing an sld editor using the existing styling/classification mechanism) - Adding vendor specific parameters to the request - Access to the layer abstracts ... the title and name of the layer are often not enough to really assess the content. Thanks for a great article. It'll get lots of developers thinking. Chris,

This is a great set of best practices for w*s clients.

Three more for wms:

- Ability to use your own styled layer descriptor (bonus points for implementing an sld editor using the existing styling/classification mechanism)

- Adding vendor specific parameters to the request

- Access to the layer abstracts … the title and name of the layer are often not enough to really assess the content.

Thanks for a great article. It’ll get lots of developers thinking.

]]>